Rijeka: Two ahead, two behind, and the masked rider
Posted in ChessBase on марта 12, 2010
12.03.2010
– No one was spared on the top boards in the European Championship, and exciting, uncompromising games were the result, to the delight of chess fans. Both top boards featuring Efimenko and Jobava against Nisipeanu and Timofeev leave two ahead and two playing catch-up. Also find out about the untitled Belarussian who is +1 against 2600+ competition. Round six report.
Advertisement
Nigel Davies:
French Defence Strategy
The French Defence is one of the best choices a player can make for his opening repertoire, especially older players with limited study time. The solid construction of Blacks game puts the onus on positional understanding and makes it immune to sharp and tricky variations. The longer you play the French the better youll play it. On this DVD Nigel Davies explains the strategy behind the French Defence by examining typical pawn structures and explaining the plans and ideas for both sides.
This event is taking place from March 6th to 18th 2010 in Rijeka, Croatia.
Top players include Almasi, Bacrot, Movsesian, Navara, Vallejo, Motylev, Adams,
Tomashevsky, Alekseev, Baadur, Naiditsch, Akopian, Volokitin, Bologan and Caruana.
Round four + five report
By Albert Silver
Round five started with a quick draw on top board between tournament leaders
GM Baadur Jobava and Zahar Efimenko, and others seeking to rejoin them. Both
Timofeev and Nisipeanu did exactly that, though Nisipeanu’s game was undoubtedly
the game of the round. The Romanian was paired against Canadian GM Yannick Pelletier,
and the opening made it clear that he had carefully prepared for the duel.
Nisipeanu,LD (2661) - Pelletier,Y (2611) [E15]
11th EICC Men Rijeka CRO (5), 10.03.2010
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.g3 Ba6 5.Qc2 Bb7 6.Bg2 c5 7.d5 exd5 8.cxd5 Nxd5
9.0-0 Be7 10.Rd1 Nc6 11.Qf5 Nf6 12.e4 d6 13.e5 Qd7
|
|
White has consistently exchanged queens with 14.Qxd7+, as in Carlsen-Pelletier
(Biel, 2008). Nisipeanu's novelty 14.Qc2N has his queen hopping around
like a Mexican jumping bean. Is it genuinely sound or simply a bold gamble?
14...Nb4 15.Qe2. 15.Qb3? Bd5 16.Qa3 dxe5! 17.Nxe5 Qf5 18.Qa4+ Kf8 19.Bxd5
Nbxd5 20.Re1 Bd6 21.Nc4 Bc7-/+ and Black is simply up a pawn. 15...Ba6. Until
now, the game looks more like the Romanian is playing Russian roulette with
himself, as he alone appears to be in constant danger of losing quickly and
badly. Still, since the prepared novelty is his, one must presume his plan goes
beyond simply astounding the audience with his death-defying acts. 16.Qe1.
16.Qd2? Ne4 17.Qe3 d5. 16...Nc2 17.Qd2 Nxa1 18.exf6 Bxf6 19.Re1+ Be7
20.Nc3
|
|
Pelletier had managed to acquire some material, but now it was starting to
look as if he were the one on a tightrope. He was no doubt anxious to get his
king to safety and bring some sanity to the game, however the natural looking
20...0-0? was a mistake, allowing White to exploit the various gaps in
his position. Better was 20...0-0-0 as White has no immediate threats,
and will need to take the time to capture the knight, allowing Black to consolidate,
e.g. 21.Qd5 Bb7 22.Qd3 Rhe8 23.Bd2 Bf6 24.Rxa1. 21.Ne5 Qc8 22.Nc6! Bd8 23.Nd5!
White's knights have become shameless bullies, and shape an attractive geometric
motif. 23...Qg4 [23...Qxc6?? 24.Ne7+ Bxe7 25.Bxc6] 24.b3 Bb7 25.h3!
Qh5 26.Nce7+ Kh8 27.Nf4 1-0. [Click
to replay]
A few boards down, top German GM Naiditsch, only a whisper away from also being
the first German to break the 2700 barrier, was able to avenge his repeated
choice of an opening line.
Rodshtein,M (2609) - Naiditsch,A (2691) [E04]
11th EICC Men Rijeka CRO (5), 10.03.2010
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 d5 4.g3 dxc4 5.Bg2 Nc6 6.Qa4 Nd7 7.Qxc4 Nb6 8.Qb5
a6 9.Qd3 e5 10.Nxe5 Nb4 11.Qd1 Qxd4 12.Qxd4 Nc2+ 13.Kd1 Nxd4 14.Be3 Nf5 15.Bxb6
cxb6
|
|
The German GM has reached this position twice before, against no less than
Kramnik and Eljanov, losing both games. For those relying on stats for their
opening choices, this would lead it to be buried for good. But the truth is
the line wasn't to blame, and, as the saying goes, third time's a charm. 16.Nc3
Bc5 17.Nd3N. Kramnik chose 17.e3 though achieved nothing from the opening
after 17...0-0 18.Ke2 Re8 19.Nd3 Rb8. 17...0-0 18.Ne4 Be7 19.e3 Bd7 20.Ke2
Bc6 21.Rhc1 Rfe8 22.g4?
|
|
On the surface this might look like a good move as it forces the knight to
h6 and restricts its movement. Unfortunately for White, this concept is illusory
as it lasts no more than 3 moves and does nothing to improve his position.
Better was 22.Ne5 Bb5+ followed by 23.Nc4 Rac8 and 24.b3. 22...Nh6 23.Bf3
Rad8. The idea of 23...Nxg4 planning 24.Bxg4 Bxe4 fails to the zwischenzug
24.Rxc6! bxc6 25.Bxg4. 24.h3 f5 25.gxf5 Nxf5 26.Ne5 Bb5+ 27.Nc4 Bh4 28.Bh1
Rf8?! [with the idea 28...Bc6 29.Ncd2 Rf8] 29.a4 Nd6 30.axb5 Nxe4 31.f4
Ng3+ 32.Kf3 axb5 33.Ne5 Rd5 34.Ng4 Rd2 35.Rc7 Rxb2 36.Rg1 h5 37.Ne5 Nf5 38.Ke4
Rd2 39.Rd7 Nd6+ wins the exchange since 40.Kf3 allows 40...Rf2 mate.
0-1. []
One very strange development was in the game between Bareev and Stocek. Bareev
is an odd bird in the world elite in that his positional play and understanding
of the game are deservedly ranked among the best, yet he has also been on the
receiving end of some of the shortest miniatures in history, and is extremely
erratic tactically. Consider the crushing position he set up against GM Stocek.
Bareev,E (2667) - Stocek,J (2591) [A29]
11th EICC Men Rijeka CRO (5), 10.03.2010
1.c4 Nf6 2.Nc3 e5 3.Nf3 Nc6 4.g3 Bc5 5.Bg2 d6 6.0-0 0-0 7.e3 a6 8.a3 h6 9.b4
Ba7 10.d3 Be6 11.Bb2 Qd7 12.Qc2 Ne7 13.Rfd1 Bh3 14.Bh1 Nf5 15.c5 Rfe8 16.e4
Ne7 17.d4 exd4 18.Nxd4 Ng6 19.Nf5 Ne5 20.Nd5 Nxd5 21.Rxd5 Bxf5 22.exf5 Qe7 23.Rxe5
dxe5 24.Bxb7 Rad8 25.Bxa6 Qg5 26.Re1 Qd2 27.Qc3 Rd4 28.Bb5 Rb8 29.Rxe5 Qxc3
30.Bxc3 Rd1+ 31.Bf1 Rc1 32.Bd4 Rd8 33.Be3 Ra1 34.Kg2 Rxa3 35.Re7 Bb8 36.f6 Ra4
37.b5 Kf8 38.c6 gxf6 39.Bc5 Kg7 40.Rd7 Rc8 41.Be2 Re4 42.Bd3 Ra4 43.Be3 Rb4
44.Be2 Kg6 45.Bc5
|
|
White's winning plan is to position one bishop to hit on f7 and the other
to attack f8, preventing the rook from protecting the f7 pawn. Black's sole
rook in the battlefield can only delay this but not prevent it, and black will
be forced to return an exchange, sealing his fate. 45...Ra4 46.Rd5. This
move, taking the rook away from its dream post, is a sure sign Bareev has lost
the thread of the position. 46.Bf3 Rc4 47.Be3 Rc3 (47...Rb4 48.Bd5 Rxb5
49.Bxf7+ Kf5 (49...Kh7 50.Bc4+) 50.Kf3 threatening g4+ and Bf4 mate.
50...h5 51.h3 and the mate is unstoppable.) 48.Bd5 Rf8 49.Bd2 followed by Bb4.
46...Kg7 47.Bh5 Re4 48.Bd4 Rce8 49.Rd7 Rxd4 50.Rxd4 Re5 51.g4 Kf8 52.f4 Re2+
53.Kf1 Ba7 54.Ra4 Rf2+ 55.Ke1 Bb6 56.Ra8+ Ke7 57.f5 Rxh2 58.Rh8 Rb2 59.Rh7 Kd6
60.Rxf7 Ke5 61.Re7+ 1/2-1/2. [Click
to replay]
Round six
The sixth round had the four leaders with 4.5/6 playing each other, followed
by no less than 23 players with four points. Under the circumstances, it was
clear there was no room for a quiet draw as had been the case in round five,
and the round did not disappoint, with many a grandmaster’s blood spilled
over the board.
In the lead: Georgian GM Baadur Jobava
Timofeev,Artyom - Jobava,Baadur [B12]
11th EICC Men Rijeka/Croatia (6), 11.03.2010
1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.f3. This line that had yielded him a quick victory
in last year's European Championship. 3...Qb6 4.Nc3 dxe4 5.Nxe4 Bf5. As
he knew Jobava had to know the previous game, and undoubtedly smelling a rat,
he deviates first with 6.c3
|
|
Play proceeded normally, with no edge on either side. 6...Nd7 7.Bd3 e5
8.Ne2 exd4 9.cxd4 Bb4+ 10.Bd2 Ne7 11.0-0 0-0 12.Kh1 Bxd2 13.Qxd2 Rad8 14.Rac1
Bg6 15.Bc4 Qc7 16.b4 Nb6 17.Bb3 Nbd5 18.b5 Qb6 19.bxc6 Nxc6 20.Rc5 Ndb4 21.Qc3
Na6 22.Rd5 Nc7 23.Rxd8 Rxd8
|
|
Until now, both sides had played solidly and consistently, but Timofeev is
the first to go astray with 24.Qc5. Better was 24.a4 Qa5 25.Qxa5 Nxa5
26.Ba2=. 24...Qxc5 25.Nxc5 Na5 26.Kg1 b6 27.Ne4 Nxb3 28.axb3 f6 29.Kf2 Kf8
30.Rc1 Nd5 31.g4 Ke7 32.h4 Bf7 33.g5. The position continued to degrade
and by 33...a5
|
|
White was in serious trouble, having to face Black's queenside 2-1 majority
and better placed pieces. Jobava never let go and won after 34.gxf6+ gxf6
35.Rc6 Be6 36.Nd2 Rc8 37.Rxc8 Bxc8 38.Nc4 Ba6 39.Nc1 Kd7 40.Ne3 Nxe3 41.Kxe3
Bb7 42.Kf4 Ke6 43.Kg4 Kd5 44.Kf5 Kxd4 45.f4 Kc3 46.Kxf6 Kd2 47.Ke5 0-1. [Click
to replay]

Efimenko,Zahar - Nisipeanu,Liviu-Dieter [B04]
11th EICC men Rijeka/Croatia (6), 11.03.2010
On board 2, with Efimenko playing Nisipeanu, opening preparation took an even
more radical direction. Right on move one, Efimenko was no doubt taken aback
when his Romanian opponent answered his 1.e4 with 1...Nf6 The
database says this is the first time Liviu has ever played the Alekhine in a
tournament game. Nisipeanu is known to be a loose cannon, and this often
works to his advantage, but can this really be the best approach to such a crucial
game? Efimenko's opponent-specific preparation may have gone out the window,
but that doesn't mean he isn't equipped to handle the Alekhine as a rule. On
the other hand, Nisipeanu will be playing an opening with which he has zero
experience. Even if he has been secretly readying it to be included in his repertoire,
there are better moments to unleash it. The surprise effect doesn't work as
hoped, and after 2.e5 Nd5 3.d4 d6 4.Nf3 dxe5 5.Nxe5 c6 6.Be2 Nd7 7.Nf3 g6
8.0-0 Bg7 9.c4 N5f6 10.Nc3 0-0 11.Bf4 Nh5 12.Bg5 h6 13.Be3 Qc7 14.Qd2 Kh7 15.Rad1
|
|
Black is already in trouble with a knight offside, and an underdeveloped position.
Efimenko turns this into a huge attack and ten moves later, after 15...Rd8
16.g4 Nhf6 17.Bf4 Qb6 18.g5 Nh5 19.gxh6 Bf6 20.Ne4 Nxf4 21.Qxf4 Rf8 22.c5 Qxb2
23.Bc4
|
|
Black's pieces have barely moved off their squares, yet is facing an imminent
mate, and calls it a day after 23...Kh8 24.Nfg5 Bxg5 25.Nxg5 f6 26.Nf7+ Kh7
27.Rfe1 Re8 28.Ng5+ Kh8 29.Ne6 b5 30.Bb3 a5 31.Nc7 a4 32.Bf7 e5 33.Qg3 1-0.
[]

Caruana,Fabiano - Salgado Lopez,Ivan [B04]
11th EICC men Rijeka/Croatia (6), 11.03.2010
Interestingly enough, young Caruana also faced an Alekhine in his game today,
and in a black day for the opening, he too put together a devastating attack
as can be seen after 1.e4 Nf6 2.e5 Nd5 3.d4 d6 4.Nf3 dxe5 5.Nxe5 c6 6.Bc4
Nd7 7.Nf3 N7b6 8.Be2 Bg4 9.0-0 e6 10.h3 Bh5 11.Ne5 Bxe2 12.Qxe2 Be7 13.c4 Nf6
14.Rd1 0-0 15.Nc3 a5 16.Bf4 a4 17.Rd3 Re8 18.Rad1 Nbd7 19.Qf3 Qa5 20.g4 h6 21.h4
Nxe5 22.dxe5 Nh7 23.g5 a3 24.b3 Rad8
|
|
25.gxh6 g6 26.Rd7 Rxd7 27.Rxd7 Bxh4 28.Rxb7 Rf8 29.Ne4 Qe1+ 30.Kg2 Qb1 31.Be3
f5 32.exf6 Nxf6 33.Nxf6+ Bxf6 34.h7+ Kh8 35.Bh6 1-0. [Click
to replay]
On an interesting side note, another player drew attention due to both his
result and unusual circumstances. Down the list, one will find an untitled Belarusian,
rated 2502 no less, who has scored +1 in his five encounters with 2600+ grandmasters.
Today he played the experienced Vladimir Belov, rated 2619, who tried as he
may to beat the unknown player, but to no avail. The game was nothing any engine
would recommend, that is for certain, but it certainly made for some extremely
entertaining chess. Except for his opponent that is...
Belov,Vladimir (2619) - Podolchenko,Evgeniy (2502) [A30]
11th EICC men Rijeka/Croatia (6), 11.03.2010
The game started rather normally after 1.Nf3 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.Nc3 e6 4.g3
b6 5.Bg2 Bb7 6.0-0 a6 7.Re1 d6 8.e4 Be7 9.d4 cxd4 10.Nxd4 Qc7 11.Be3 Nbd7 12.f4
0-0 13.Rc1 Rac8 14.f5 e5 15.Nb3
|
Did you guess who the (future) grandmaster was?Posted in ChessBase on марта 12, 2010 12.03.2010 Advertisement Nigel Davies:
Who is this grandmaster?We asked you to guess who the cute young child in the photo is.
Once again we provided you with some more or less helpful clues:
Well, almost all readers guessed who the future grandmaster was. Nigel Short Nigel Short – Greatest HitsNigel spent a week in Hamburg, recording two DVDs for ChessBase, and getting
The ChessBase DVDs "Nigel Short – Greatest Hits" will appear Reader feedbackOnce again we can only bring you a selection of the hundreds of letters we Kajetan Wandowicz, Wroclaw, Poland Gerardo Vázquez, Mexico City, Mexico Jan Olderdissen, Simi Valley, USA Susan, US Virgin Islands Vernon Walker, Canada Vinod Vishwanath, Bangalore, India Kevin Cotreau, Merrimack, NH USA Fred Lucas, Netherlands
Osvaldo Téllez Almirall, Edomex, Mexico Stein Kulseth Bhalchandra Thatte, Oxford, U.K. Brian Hayden,Ireland Rajesh V, Seattle, USA Geir Sune Tallaksen Østmoe, Kongsberg, Norway Ramón Jiménez, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic Jonathan Paxman, Perth, Australia Casper Dahl Rasmussen, Copenhagen Seena Daneshvar, Tehran, Iran Duncan Vella, Swieqi, Malta Derek Jones, Aylesbury, England Navin Sawalani, Madison, WI, USA Lionel Laffranchise, Bray en Val, France M Jagadish, Pune, India Wade Caughlin, Grande Prairie, Canada Shiv Mathur, Mumbai, India Steve Goodman, Falls Church, VA, United States Peter Ballard, Australia Ramesh Vakharia, India Elvin Solomon, Australia Ralvin, Manikam, Selangor, Malaysia John Moncada, Pto cabezas, Nicaragua John Moncada, Pto cabezas, Nicaragua Royce Campbell, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA Lu Tahmazyan, Los Angeles Mark Vogan, Houston, TX, USA Ted Teodoro, River Ege, USA Alok Nagdev, Los Angeles Danny Ramos, Paranaque, Philippines Bobby Bower, Nassau, Bahamas Zhigen Lin, Melbourne, Australia Wendel Lopez, San Pedro Sula, Honduras C.A. Benjamin, Brandt, Saginaw, USA Aben Rudy, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA Colin Reed, Birmingham, England Nick Beqo, Vancouver, Canada Markus Bindig, Reinsdorf Shanker Raman, Calgary, Canada Pat Parimi, Boston, USA Jonathan Kenny, Virginia, USA Ivan Smilianov, Peshtera, Bulgaria Karlo Bala Jr., 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia Lawrence Henderson, Nevada USA Carsten Hansen, Hackensack, USA Khondakar Dhaka, Bangladesh John Moncada, Pto Cabezas, Nicaragua Béla János, Putyinger Flemming Høgh, Frederiksberg Copenhagen Andra Cimina, Athens, Greece Alexei Kulashko, Auckland, New Zealand Sundararajan Ganesan, Pudukkottai, India Ed Zator, Toronto, Canada Brian Karen, Levittown, USA Juan Carlos Rodriguez, Buenos Aires Fenisevic Dragan, Croatia Bona Dilo, Botswana Gerald Aycardo, Cebu City, Philippines Johan Geyser, Johannesburg, South Africa Yigal Nochomovitz, Ph.D., New York, NY Samuel Stolpe, Falls Church, VA, USA Kieran Delamotte, France Dag Standnes, Bergen, Norway William Taylor, Bridgwater, England Johan Hut, Baarn, Holland John Kunz, Watetown, NY USA Alfred Acaling III, Cadiz City Rico Moreno, Honolulu, HI, USA Gerry Smith, Dublin Manny Balidio, Waipahu, Hawaii (USA) Thiamhee, Lai, Penang, Malaysia Pedro Silva, Coimbra, Portugal Bolivar Gonzalez, Brazil Cosmin Cretu, Romania Jon Crumiller, Princeton New Jersey USA Jamshid Begmatov, Tashkent, Uzbekistan Jacob, Portukalian, Los Angeles, CA Natan, Estivallet, Porto Alegre, Brazil Woody Jackson, Kent, UK John Rose, Media, USA Ilya Krasik, Boston, USA Andre, Cardon, S. Paulo, Brazil Juan, Beserra, Brazil The fortress breakerPosted in ChessBase on марта 11, 2010 11.03.2010 Advertisement Nigel Davies: Tactics, White turned to radical measures with 55.f5!? Karsten Müller demonstrates
Workshop: Kibitzing in ChessBase LightPosted in ChessBase on марта 11, 2010 11.03.2010 Advertisement Nigel Davies: Rijeka: Jobava, Efimenko lead, zero tolerance appealPosted in ChessBase on марта 10, 2010 10.03.2010 Advertisement Nigel Davies: This event is taking place from March 6th to 18th 2010 in Rijeka, Croatia. Zero tolerance protest in RijekaAt the Dresden Olympiad in 2008 some players forfeited their games when they The participants of the 11th European Individual Championships in Rijeka have Round four leadersThirteen players went into round four with a perfect 3.0/3 score, and two came
Krasenkow,M (2652) - Jobava,Ba (2695) [B38] White is doing well enough, and after Qh4 and Rxd5 he might be playing for
In the women's section four players had perfect scores after three rounds,
1 из 93 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 »
|










































