Feed on
Posts
Comments

Tag Archive 'Bobby Fischer'

23.01.2010
– Just occasionally, the worlds of chess and murder have intersected: players
of our game have become either killers or victims. In addition to links to his
detailed coverage of the Wallace Murder Case and the fatal shooting of a Hastings
stalwart, the Editor of Chess
Notes
provides citations regarding such figures as the Lipstick Killer,
Moors Murderer and St Albans Poisoner.

Advertisement

Yasser Seirawan:
My best games

Grandmaster Yasser Seirawan began playing chess in the summer of 1972 and by 1979 he had won the World Junior Championship and in January of 1980 earned his final Grandmaster norm. What had he learned in seven and a half years that propelled him so far so quickly?
More information...

Chess Explorations (35)

By Edward Winter

Our article Chess and the Wallace Murder Case relates a famous, particularly
baffling mystery, and occasional Chess Notes items have mentioned other connections
between chess and killing. Often, though, the information available is scant.

C.N. 3670 referred to the lethally charming Neville George Clevely Heath (born
1917), quoting a passage from page 189 of Portrait of a Sadist by Paull
Hill (London, 1960) which describes the killer’s last days, at Pentonville
Prison, London:

‘He spent a lot of time reading, made copious notes for his legal advisers,
played a certain amount of chess with the warders, two of whom were in his
cell day and night, and wrote a lot of letters to friends and his family.’


Neville George Clevely Heath

Neville Heath was hanged on 16 October 1946, the same day as, in Nuremberg,
Hans Frank
suffered the identical fate.

William George Heirens (see C.N. 3707) was a 17-year-old student at the University
of Chicago when, in 1946, he confessed to three murders. He became known as the
‘Lipstick Killer’ because on a wall in one of the victims’ homes
a message was found written in lipstick: ‘For heavens sake catch me before
I kill more. I cannot control myself.’ Although the evidence against Heirens
has been fiercely disputed, he is still in prison.


William Heirens

Page 102 of “Before I Kill More...” by Lucy Freeman (New
York, 1955) relates that at university Heirens had taken up chess, and on page
128 he is quoting as telling her:

‘Later I learned the psychiatrists that examined me were of the type
which only consider abnormalities that had a physical relationship, like tumors
on the brain, epilepsy and related diseases. They probably couldn’t
tell a person was possessed with a dual personality unless they examined a
Siamese twin.

There wasn’t a thing I could do about it. My counsel were running the
show. I was just a pawn to be pushed around the chess board and sacrificed
when it suited their whims.’

The case of the chess master Raymond Weinstein will be recalled.


Left to right: Jerry Spann (captain), Raymond Weinstein and
William Lombardy (world student team championship in Leningrad)

As recorded on page 127 of Chess Explorations (C.N. 1311), the late
Sidney Bernstein informed us in the 1980s:

‘I have it on most reliable authority (the author John Collins,
who was a close friend of Raymond Weinstein) that Weinstein (an extremely
strong and promising young player who finished third in the 1960-61 US Championship)
had been confined to a mental institution. While on temporary leave, he was
rooming with an older man who made derogatory remarks about Weinstein’s
mother. Raymond slit the man’s throat with a razor, and was, of course,
incarcerated permanently. Raymond’s mother is also in an asylum.’

Collins discussed Weinstein’s chess career on pages 195-235 of his book
My Seven Chess Prodigies (New York, 1974).

Another case in the United States has been extensively covered by other writers:
Claude Bloodgood.

As regards chessplaying victims, there are numerous accounts of the killing of the French master
Gilles Andruet in 1995. Abe Turner was murdered on the premises of Chess
Review
in 1962. C.N.
6423
gave a photograph of Turner in play against Bobby Fischer in the final
round of the 1957-58 US Championship in New York.

C.N. 5441 mentioned that on 5 December 1924 Norman Thorne (1900-1925) of Crowborough,
England dismembered his fiancée Elsie Cameron. Earlier that day he had
bought ‘a game of chess’ in Tunbridge Wells. Source: page 114 of
The Trial of Norman Thorne by Helena Normanton (London, circa
1929). Much has been written about that famous murder case, but we recall no
other reference to chess in connection with the life of Thorne, who was hanged
on 22 April 1925.


John Norman Holmes Thorne giving evidence at his trial, Lewes, 13 March 1925

A fine account of the case appeared on pages 88-126 of Verdict in Dispute
by Edgar Lustgarten (London, 1949). From page 108:

‘Spilsbury [the pathologist Sir Bernard Spilsbury, who was the prosecution’s
expert witness] had indeed done what few can hope to do; he had become a legend
in his own lifetime. To the man in the street he stood for pathology as Hobbs
stood for cricket or Dempsey for boxing or Capablanca for chess.’

As mentioned in C.N. 5939, page 27 of The Even More Complete Chess Addict
by M. Fox and R. James (London, 1993) stated that John Reginald Halliday Christie
(who lived at 10 Rillington Place, London) ‘was a goodish chessplayer’
and that ‘Whilst awaiting the ultimate punishment in Brixton, he passed
the time thrashing his warders at chess (Chris the chess champion, they nicknamed
him).’ The grounds for these assertions remain to be discovered, since much
of the book is a source-free zone.

On a documented basis we added in that C.N. item that two other British serial
murderers regularly played chess against each other. On page 132 of The Gates
of Janus
(Los Angeles, 2001) Ian Brady described playing chess against Graham
Young (‘the St Albans Poisoner’) in Parkhurst Prison on the Isle
of Wight:

‘An inveterate but excitable chessplayer, he rather foolishly favoured
the black pieces, likening their potency to the Nazi SS. His daily opponent
on the board for years was the author of this book, against whom Young always
failed to win a match.’


Graham Young

Finally, attention is drawn to our feature article Chessplayer
Shot Dead in Hastings
.

Postscript: For a nineteenth-century case, see ‘Death of a Chessman: The Sad, Brutal Murder of Major William Cheever Wilson’ on pages 1-18 of Essays in American Chess History by John Hilbert (Yorklyn, 2002). In recent times, as mentioned to us by Hans Jørgen Lassen (Grenaa, Denmark), there has been the case of
Simon Webb
(1949-2005).


Submit information
or suggestions on chess explorations

All ChessBase articles
by Edward Winter


Edward
Winter is the editor of Chess
Notes
, which was founded in January 1982 as "a forum for aficionados
to discuss all matters relating to the Royal Pastime". Since then, over 6,450
items have been published, and the series has resulted in four books by Winter:
Chess
Explorations
(1996), Kings,
Commoners and Knaves
(1999), A
Chess Omnibus
(2003) and Chess
Facts and Fables
(2006). He is also the author of a monograph
on Capablanca
(1989).

Chess Notes is well known for its historical research, and anyone browsing
in its archives
will find a wealth of unknown games, accounts of historical mysteries, quotes
and quips, and other material of every kind imaginable. Correspondents from
around the world contribute items, and they include not only "ordinary readers"
but also some eminent historians – and, indeed, some eminent masters. Chess
Notes is located at the Chess
History Center.
Signed copies of Edward Winter's publications are
currently available.

Chessbase.com

Read Full Post »

21.01.2010
– Many books have been written about the American chess genius and world champion Bobby Fischer. But now there is a remarkable new one, by German GM Karsten Müller, whom you will know from his articles and multimedia lectures in ChessBase Magazine. This book contains almost 1000 Fischer games, all of them annotated by GM Müller – a monumental task. Interview with the author.

Advertisement

Yasser Seirawan:
My best games

Grandmaster Yasser Seirawan began playing chess in the summer of 1972 and by 1979 he had won the World Junior Championship and in January of 1980 earned his final Grandmaster norm. What had he learned in seven and a half years that propelled him so far so quickly?
More information...

Karsten Müller: Bobby Fischer –
The Career and Complete Games of the American World Chess Champion


The years after the Second World War saw international chess dominated
by the Soviets Botvinnik, Smyslov, Tal, Petrosian and then Spassky held
the world crown, treating it as if it were almost an integral part of
their country's heritage. Then, in the mid-1950s, a lone genius from Brooklyn
emerged. Obsessed with chess, all his waking hours became devoted to finding
truth on the 64 squares. It was an unrelenting, sometimes frustrating
quest, but he persevered, eventually emerging as perhaps the greatest
natural chess talent ever: Bobby Fischer.

Now, for the first time, every single one of his tournament and match
games is presented with insightful explanations and analysis. German GM
Karsten Müller annotates each game – almost 1,000 of them –
supplemented by crosstables of every major tournament and match in which
Fischer participated, dozens of archival photographs, along with brief
comments and observations putting the play of the great champion into
historical perspective.

Karsten Müller: Bobby Fischer – The
Games and Career of the American World Chess Champion
, Russell
Enterprises 2009, 408 pages. You can buy the book from Chess
Cafe
, New
in Chess
, or order it from Amazon.

An interview with the author

By Johannes Fischer

Johannes Fischer: Hello Karsten. You have just published
a new book about Bobby Fischer. Bobby Fischer: The Career and Complete Games
of the American World Chess Champion. The book traces Fischer’s career
and contains all known games by Fischer – all of them annotated by you.
The book has a fine design and a pleasant layout, it contains a lot of nice,
partly unknown, pictures. But still: do we need another book about Fischer
– after Agur’s book about Fischer’s style, Hübner’s
ChessBase DVDs and Kasparov’s book, not to mention all the other works
about Fischer?

GM Karsten Müller: The publisher Hanon W. Russell convinced
me that after Fischer’s death a book with all his tournament and match
games was due. He provided a lot of photos and won Larry Evans to write the
foreword and Andy Soltis to discuss Fischer’s contributions to opening
theory.


GM Carsten Müller, endgame expert and ChessBase Magazine commentator

What distinguishes your book from all the others about Fischer?

My book looks at really all known tournament games, which leads to a comprehensive
picture of Fischer’s chess. It allows us to follow Fischer’s entire
career from Wunderkind to World Champion.

You played through and annotated all games of Fischer. I could imagine
that doing the same with some of today’s leading players might be rather
boring. How about Fischer?

Well, it was definitely not boring, because there are virtually no short draws
or games without content. What made things even more interesting was to compare
the analyses of Fischer, Hübner and Kasparow. Their views often differed
and I had to take sides.

Fischer was a “Wunderkind”: at 14 he became the US Champion,
at 15 the youngest grandmaster ever, a record that lasted 34 years. At 15
he was already one of the world’s best players, but it took him twelve
more years to become World Champion. Where do you see the crucial moments
in Fischer’s career? And was he really that much better in the beginning
of the 70s than in the beginning of and in the mid-60s – and if so,
why?

One could briefly sketch Fischer’s chess career as follows: from 1955
to 1962 first the rise from Wunderkind to extended world class. That was followed
by the setback at the Candidates tournament in Curacao, where he was one of
the top favorites but only finished in the middle of the field. As a result
he played much less and mainly in the US. He did not play in the Interzonal
in Amsterdam 1964 and he left the Interzonal in Sousse 1967 prematurely even
though he was clearly in the lead – one of the most mysterious moments
in his entire chess career.

Because of heightened political cold war tension, Fischer was unable
to obtain a visa to participate in the 1965 Capablanca Memorial. He played
by telex from the Marshall Chess Club in New York.

In this photograph, the tournament referee in New York, J.F. Reinhardt,
makes White's second move in the Lehmann-Fischer game. [Photo: Al Lawrence]

He again goes into reclusion and does not play a single tournament game in
1969. In hindsight this phase seems to be crucial. He trains intensively and
in 1970 he returns with added strength to the tournament arena to take part
in the match USSR against the Rest of the World and to begin the strongest phase
of his career. From 1970-1972 he achieved one of the best, if not the best,
result that has ever been achieved. He lost only 5 of 102 games, won two candidate
matches (against Taimanov and Larsen) 6-0, and before the match in Reykjavik
he led World Champion Spassky by 125 Elo points on the world ranking list, making
him the clear number one. In this phase he was stronger than before: his chess
was more mature, he played the openings more flexibly and his opponents had
developed a kind of Fischer-fear. Before the match in Reykjavik even Spassky
was not sure whether he was better than Fischer.

Fischer brought many people to chess. What is fascinating about his play
and what fascinates you about it?

Clarity and fighting spirit.

What distinguishes his play, what are his strengths, what are his weaknesses?

As far as strength is concerned, his endurance and his will to fight down to
the bare king and to subordinate everything to chess. Moreover, he was particularly
strong in endgames, in which he had a slight initiative, and when transforming
advantages. In matches he was often able to seize the psychological initiative
and to impose his will on the opponent. Naming weaknesses is much more difficult.
In the beginning sticking stubbornly to certain openings was a weakness, but
he managed to overcome that almost completely in the period 1970-1972. His desire
to keep things under control made him sometimes shy away from risks. However,
due to his enormous fighting spirit this did not lead to many draws. Further
weaknesses lie certainly more in the realm of psychology. Such problems led
to his departure in Sousse, but between 1970 and 1972 they did not affect his
chess very much. Afterwards they arguably became more intensive.

Let’s assume you were coach and had to prepare one of your charges
against Fischer: What would you recommend, which opening should he play, what
should he aim for, what should he avoid?


Bobby always believed that staying physically fit was very
important to playing chess well. [Photo: Frank Brady]

Obviously this depends partly on the person who had to play against Fischer.
With White one might try to attack aggressively in the Najdorf or one might
play 1.d4 with the idea of keeping things under control, as Spassky often did
in the return match in 1992. With Black, Caro-Kann is a serious option –
Fischer tried a lot of things against this opening, but nothing could fully
convince. One should definitely avoid positions, in which Fischer has things
under control and a slight initiative.

And what do you have to do if you want to play chess like Fischer?

Subordinate everything in life to chess – but whatever its advantages,
such an approach definitely also has disadvantages.

How current is Fischer’s way of playing chess nowadays? Which heritage
did he leave?

As far as Fischer’s openings are concerned, the Najdorf and the King’s
Indian in particular are as popular as ever. As far as his style is concerned,
many players gained a lot from studying his games. Even in the Soviet Union
Fischer’s masterpiece My 60 Memorable Games was very popular. In general
his heritage is so large that I cannot comprehensively deal with it here.

The book contains a lot of nice photos and biographical sketches, but
refrains from exploiting or evaluating the many controversial issues which
mark Fischer’s career. Still, here’s a question about Fischer’s
biography. As a person Fischer was difficult and eccentric, as a chessplayer
he liked clarity and control. Do you have to separate Fischer’s chess
and his biography or is Fischer’s dedication to chess a reaction to
his emotional instability?

I am not the one to ask that question, and that is one reason why I try to
avoid such questions in my book.

Your book is more or less neutral – controversial issues in Fischer’s
career, such as his charge the Soviets had manipulated the tournament in Curacao
are mentioned but not evaluated. Why?

If you start digging in that garden, you will never hit the bottom. At any
rate, not within the scope of 400 pages and that’s how long the book was
planned to be. I also believe that I am not the right author for such a topic.
I therefore tried to focus almost exclusively on chess matters.

At the peak of his career Fischer withdrew from tournament chess and
there has been lots of speculations about his reasons for doing so. What do
you think?

Of course, I, too, can only speculate. After Fischer had reached the aim of
his life, to become World Champion, he presumably fell into a hole and went
into complete reclusion. Before the match against Karpov in 1975 he might have
been afraid to lose and felt that he had nothing to win because the crucial
step had already been taken in 1972. In 1992 he played again because he knew
Spassky whereas Karpov in 1975 raised a lot of uncomfortable questions for Fischer.
But the whole issue obviously remains a mystery.

Fischer was a self-taught person and had no trainer. He still developed
into a universal player. Would he have been even better with a trainer?

I think from 1970 to 1972 he really played extremely well and it is unlikely
that he could have been better in this time. However, after winning the title
in 1972, things look differently. But presumably he would not have needed a
chess trainer in the classical sense, just a good friend to work with, someone
Fischer trusted and listened to.

Fischer’s fighting spirit is legendary. Is this a myth or do his
games indeed reflect this will to win?

That is no myth and Fischer’s will to win can indeed be seen in his games.
He almost never made quick draws but simply played on and continued to create
pressure. Tal for example said that he would have agreed to a draw in the adjourned
second game of the match against Taimanov. But Fischer just played on. And then
the miracle occurred. With 81...Ke4? Taimanov went wrong and lost.

Fischer played many famous games. Which one do you consider to be particularly
typical for his style?

Well, that’s difficult to say. For a start, I think his candidates match
against Taimanov is quite characteristic. Here one can see a lot of Fischer’s
strengths. Obviously, his weaknesses did not come much to the foreground in
this match.


Fischer playing world champion Mikhail Tal at Leipzig 1960 [Photo: Frank
Brady]

Do you have a favorite Fischer game?

That’s another difficult question. But his endgame with rook and bishop
against rook and knight in the fourth game against Taimanov never fails to be
instructive and impressive.

Occasionally it is said that Magnus Carlsen plays like Fischer. What
do you think?

That’s an interesting thesis, which on first sight seems rather fitting.
Magnus has a strong fighting spirit and only starts complications when he can
control them. However, I haven’t thought much about the subject. Maybe
I should tackle this question sometime...

Of course you knew Fischer and his games before starting to work on the
book. How did your approach to Fischer change during writing?

I became even more aware what a feat it was to wrest the highest crown from
the powerful Soviet chess empire. As far as chess is concerned my respect for
Fischer became even greater. However, on the human side things look different.
But as I said, I focused on chess in the book.

Was there anything particularly surprising for you in his games, did
you have to correct prejudices or preconceived notions?

Yes, I had thought that Fischer had sacrificed more often and occasionally
strived for unclear positions. However, I realized that he valued control quite
highly.

Garry Kasparov wrote in his book about his predecessors that Fischer
may well be the best player of all time. What do you think?

I agree – as I explain in the book. The main argument here is not his
outstanding performance between 1970 and 1972, but the effect he had on the
game at large. During the match against Spassky chess made headlines in the
news and the mass media of the US and Western Europe. Fischer triggered a chess
boom all over the world and the game was simply no longer the same. If you look
at the effect of a World Champion in pure chess terms, Kasparov is obviously
a hot candidate, who even surpasses Fischer in regard to this – and he
still continues to work hard on chess. He is my number two choice.

Whose games will you analyze next?

I analyzed a couple of games by Lasker and Tal for book projects, but obviously
only a selection. Fischer seems in fact to be the ideal World Champion for analyzing
all games. The other champions simply played too many tournament games for a
single book. Fischer’s clear style also lends itself to such a project
because you need to give less variations, comments and analyzes.

Good luck for your next project and thank you for the interview!

Read Full Post »

The highest rated players of all time

05.01.2010
– According to the current FIDE rankings Magnus Carlsen is the strongest player in the world. But his rating of 2810 is not the highest ever. That was achieved by Garry Kasparov, who in the July 1999 FIDE list reached 2851 points. Two other players have at some stage had higher ratings than Magnus. Here's a list of all Super-GMs (over 2700) and their top ratings.

Advertisement

:
Deep Shredder 12 - Multiprocessor Version

Deep Shredder 12 by Stefan Meyer Kahlen. No other chess program
has won so many world championship titles. The new edition of Deep Shredder is stronger than all previous versions. Meyer Kahlen: “The improvements are visible all over
the place. Especially the search and the evaluation have become much more precise. The engine is 100 Elo points stronger than the predecessor Shredder 11.”
Available from 14 January 2010

More information...

Top Ratings of Super-GM

Three years ago Przemek Jahr of Pila, Poland, sent us a
list
of all players who had reached a rating of 2700 or higher, giving their
highest ever ratings and the year and the FIDE list in which it was achieved.
Chess fan Kostantin Ikonomovski of Jankovec, Macedonia, has been updating this
list meticulously and sent us the latest version that incorporates all list
up to the January
1st 2010 FIDE rankings
.

Konstantin is a member of the amater team of Alkaloid for many years; "That
meant that I used to have four extra vacations every year on company expences,"
he writes, "always in some wonderful places throughout the former Yugoslavia.
I carry beautiful memories of this."

Addendum: the publication of this list under the original
front page title "The strongest players of all time" has led to
some furious messages from readers who blame "rating inflation"
for putting Bobby Fischer in place nine. We have sought to placate them with
a title change ("highest rated players") and understand that we
will have to (sigh) come back to this subject again soon.

Addendum 2: We have made some corrections in the list.
Carlsen has switched places with Kramnik, whose highest rating was 2809, not
2811. Grischuk was corrected and is now one place lower, and Sergey Tiviakov
was removed from the list, since his 2700 rating in October 2005 was corrected
to 2699.

Top ten rated players of all time

The highest rating ever, by Garry Kasparov, is 38 points more than any other
player in history. Five players have crossed the 2800 mark, five players have
come within twenty points of it. Here's the complete table.

Super-GMs who achieved a 2700 or higher rating

 #

 Surname, Name

Nat.

Born

Max

When

01.10

1

Kasparov, Garry

RUS

1963

2851

1999.07

2812

2

Topalov, Veselin

BUL

1975

2813

2006.07

2805

3

Carlsen, Magnus

NOR

1990

2810

2010.01

2810

4

Kramnik, Vladimir

RUS

1975

2809

2002.01

2788

5

Anand, Viswanathan

IND

1969

2803

2006.04

2790

6

Morozevich, Alexander

RUS

1977

2788

2008.07

2732

7

Ivanchuk, Vassily

UKR

1969

2787

2007.10

2749

8

Aronian, Levon

ARM

1982

2786

2009.11

2781

9

Fischer, Robert

USA

1943

2785

1972.04

2785

10

Karpov, Anatoly

RUS

1951

2780

1994.07

2619

11

Svidler, Peter

RUS

1976

2765

2006.01

2744

12

Leko, Peter

HUN

1979

2763

2005.04

2739

13

Radjabov, Teimour

AZE

1987

2761

2009.01

2733

14

Gelfand, Boris

ISR

1968

2761

2010.01

2761

15

Mamedyarov, Shakhriyar

AZE

1985

2760

2008.01

2741

16

Jakovenko, Dmitry

RUS

1983

2760

2009.01

2730

17

Gashimov, Vugar

AZE

1986

2759

2010.01

2759

18

Shirov, Alexei

ESP

1972

2755

2008.01

2723

19

Adams, Michael

ENG

1971

2755

2000.07

2694

20

Movsesian, Sergei

SVK

1978

2751

2009.01

2704

21

Wang, Yue

CHN

1987

2749

2010.01

2749

22

Grischuk, Alexander

RUS

1983

2748

2009.04

2736

23

Kamsky, Gata

USA

1974

2745

1996.07

2693

24

Ponomariov, Ruslan

UKR

1983

2743

2002.04

2737

25

Bareev, Evgeny

RUS

1966

2739

2003.10

2643

36

Eljanov, Pavel

UKR

1983

2736

2010.01

2736

27

Polgar, Judith

HUN

1976

2735

2005.07

2682

28

Nakamura, Hikaru

USA

1987

2735

2009.09

2708

29

Karjakin Sergey

RUS

1990

2732

2008.01

2720

30

Bacrot, Etienne

FRA

1983

2731

2005.04

2713

31

Vachier-Laqrave, Maxime

FRA

1990

2730

2010.01

2730

32

Navara, David

CZE

1985

2725

2006.10

2708

33

Alekseev, Evgeny

RUS

1985

2725

2009.09

2703

34

Ni, Hua

CHN

1983

2724

2009.04

2657

35

Dominguez Perez, Lenier

CUB

1983

2721

2009.04

2712

36

Malakhov, Vladimir

RUS

1980

2716

2009.09

2716

37

Salov, Valery

RUS

1964

2715

1995.01

2644

38

Wang Hao

CHN

1989

2715

2010.01

2715

39

Van Wely, Loek

NED

1972

2714

2001.10

2652

40

Bu, Xiangzhi

CHN

1985

2714

2008.10

2682

41

Akopian, Vladimir

ARM

1971

2713

2006.07

2700

42

Cheparinov, Ivan

BUL

1986

2713

2008.01

2660

43

Short, Nigel

ENG

1965

2712

2004.04

2707

44

Sasikiran, Krishnan

IND

1981

2711

2009.01

2664

45

Vellejo-Pons Francisco

ESP

1982

2711

2009.11

2711

46

Beliavsky, Alexander

SLO

1953

2710

1997.07

2657

47

Motylev Alexander

RUS

1979

2710

2009.07

2697

48

Almasi Zoltan

HUN

1976

2710

2010.01

2710

49

Tomashevsky Evgeny

RUS

1987

2708

2009.11

2705

50

Nisipeanu, Liviu-Dieter

ROM

1976

2707

2005.10

2681

51

Kasimdzhanov, Rustam

UZB

1979

2706

2001.10

2702

52

Sokolov, Ivan

BIH

1968

2706

2004.01

2649

53

Tal, Mikhail

LAT

1936

2705

1980.01

2705

54

Dreev, Alexey

RUS

1969

2705

2003.10

2650

55

Milov, Vadim

SUI

1972

2705

2008.07

2644

56

Jobava Baadur

GEO

1983

2704

2010.01

2704

57

Rublevski, Sergei

RUS

1974

2703

2009.07

2697

58

Krasenkow, Michal

POL

1963

2702

2000.07

2656

59

Smirin, Ilia

ISR

1966

2702

2001.07

2668

60

Khalifman, Alexander

RUS

1968

2702

2001.10

2616

61

Azmaiparashvili, Zurab

GEO

1960

2702

2003.07

2637

62

Bologan, Viktor

MDA

1971

2700

2005.04

2692

63

Naiditsch Arkadij

GER

1985

2700

2008-04

2687

Colour codes: Veteran active, Retired,
Deceased

See also articles by Jeff Sonas

Copyright
ChessBase

Read Full Post »

Pal Benko improves on Troitzky

30.12.2009
– In 1856 the great Sam Loyd composed a chess problem, which 75 years later inspired Alexey Troitsky, one of the greatest composers of endgame studies, to create a puzzle with a similar theme. It proved to be flawed. 75 years after Troitzky another great composer, Pal Benko, took up his problem, improved on it and submitted it for our Christmas Puzzle page.

Andrew Martin:
The Trompowsky - The easy way - 2nd Edition

Thirty years ago the Trompowsky opening was almost totally unknown. It took a few spectacular games by Rafael Vaganian to bring 2.Bg5 into the limelight, and after that, the die was cast. Today 1.d4 Nf6 2.Bg5 is used by many of the best players in the world and a whole body of complicated theory has built up.
More information...

Benko corrects Troitzky

ChessBase
Christmas Puzzles December 30, 2009

Pal Benko, who in Hungarian is written Benkö Pál,
was born on July 14, 1928 in Amiens, France. He was raised in Hungary and soon
showed an affinity to chess. At 20 he was Hungarian champion, and was playing
for the national teams. In 1957 after the World Student Team Championship in
Reykjavik (where he scored 7.5/12 on board one) he defected to the United States,
where he started to play in national events. He was first or tied for first
in eight US championships from 1961 to 1975.

In 1959 and 1962 Benko played in the Candidates Tournament for the World Championship,
which consisted had eight of the world's top players. He was intrumental in
Bobby Fischer's ascent to the World Championship title: in 1969 Benko had won
the US Championship and thus qualified for zonals, he was amongst the top three
finishers that advanced to the Interzonals. Fischer had not played in the US
Championship and was therefore out of the cycle. Benko agreed to give up his
spot in the Interzonal in order to give Fischer another shot at the World Championship.
Fischer went on to win the title in 1972.

Pal Benko is an openings expert who has variations named after him. Everyone
knows the Benko Gambit (1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 b5), which he popularised, and
played with great success from the mid-1960s. And there is the Benko Opening
(1.g3), which he introduced at the 1962 Candidates Tournament and used to defeat
Bobby Fischer and Mikhail Tal.

In addition to his success as a player, Benko is a noted authority on the chess
endgame and a composer of endgame studies and chess problems. For decades, he
has had a column on endgames in Chess Life magazine. His studies and
problems have appeared in countless newspapers and magazines. Just to give you
an impression of his creativity here are two of our favourite examples:

Pál Benkö, Magyar Sakkélet 1972

White to play and mate in eight

If you are lucky enough not to know this problem we urge you to work on it
for a while without switching on a chess engine. Can you imagine how the solution
will go? We bet you can't.

Pál Benkö, Magyar Sakkélet 1970

Mate in three (ten positions)

  1. above diagram: solution 1.Re6!
  2. move the black king to d4: solution Nf3+!
  3. move the white bishop to g2: solution Re1!
  4. move the white knight to g6: solution Re2!
  5. move the white knight to f6: solution Re2!
  6. move the white knight to e3: solution Nc4!
  7. move the white bishop to b3: solution Nc4!
  8. move the white bishop to b5: solution Nf5+!
  9. move the white knight to d8: solution Re6!
  10. move the black king to d5: solution Re6!

Chessbase.com

Read Full Post »

The Poisoned Pawn Variation…

17.12.2009
– ... of the Najdorf used to be one of the favourite weapons of Bobby Fischer when he wanted to play for the full point (i.e. practically always). Nowadays many lines have been analysed out to a draw, yet the fascinating complications keep on attracting players. This position occurred at the last Bundesliga weekend. After
28...Ra7, which assessment is true in your opinion:
A) Black has a won position;
B) White must give perpetual check;
C) he actually wins.

The solution is here,
but first ponder over it with a larger version of the diagram.

Andrew Martin:
The Trompowsky - The easy way - 2nd Edition

Thirty years ago the Trompowsky opening was almost totally unknown. It took a few spectacular games by Rafael Vaganian to bring 2.Bg5 into the limelight, and after that, the die was cast. Today 1.d4 Nf6 2.Bg5 is used by many of the best players in the world and a whole body of complicated theory has built up.
More information...

Tactics,
Openings, Endgames - Visit ChessBase Magazine Online

White to play – position after 28...Ra7

Which assessment is true in your opinion:

A) Black has a won position;
B) White must give perpetual check;
C) he actually wins.

Chessbase.com

Read Full Post »

1 из 5 1 2 3 4 5 »